Do scientists use radiometric dating

Other creationists have focused on instances in which radiometric dating seems to yield incorrect results.In most instances, these efforts are flawed because the authors have misunderstood or misrepresented the data they attempt to analyze (for example, Woodmorappe 1979; Morris HM 1985; Morris JD 1994).Our planet was pegged at a youthful few thousand years old by Bible readers (by counting all the "begats" since Adam) as late as the end of the 19th century, with physicist Lord Kelvin providing another nascent estimate of 100 million years.Kelvin defended this calculation throughout his life, even disputing Darwin's explanations of evolution as impossible in that time period.Scientists believe they can indirectly date sedimentary rocks using radiometric dating if they find igneous or metamorphic rock imbedded in or around a sedimentary rock layer.

ANSWER: Sedimentary rocks cannot be dated directly using radiometric dating, which is based on the idea that when rocks are in liquid form, their radiometric clock resets.The assumptions which underlie radiometric dating are covered in our radiometric dating article published here. Jesus, the creator and eternal Son of God, who lived a sinless life, loves us so much that He died for our sins, taking the punishment that we deserve, was buried, and rose from the dead according to the Bible.If you truly believe and trust this in your heart, receiving Jesus alone as your Savior, declaring, "Jesus is Lord," you will be saved from judgment and spend eternity with God in heaven. When asked for your age, it's likely you won't slip (with the exception of a recent birthday mistake).But for the sprawling sphere we call home, age is a much trickier matter.This week, Cherry Lewis of the University of Bristol presented a talk about the history of dating the Earth as part of the BA Festival of Science in York, England.

You must have an account to comment. Please register or login here!